Irish Section 110 SPVs: A Guide to Securitisation Vehicles
How Irish Section 110 SPVs work for securitisation and structured finance: the tax-neutral mechanics, qualifying assets, and anti-avoidance limits.
How Irish Section 110 SPVs work for securitisation and structured finance: the tax-neutral mechanics, qualifying assets, and anti-avoidance limits.
Ireland sits at the centre of European structured finance for a reason that has little to do with low headline tax rates. The reason is a single, narrowly drafted provision of Irish tax law: Section 110 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997. It is the engine behind a very large share of European securitisations, CLOs, aircraft and asset finance structures, and debt-trading platforms.
A Section 110 SPV is an Irish-resident special purpose company that, if it meets the statutory conditions, is taxed in a way that is broadly neutral on the income from the financial assets it holds. The point is not to escape tax. The point is to let a financing vehicle pass returns through to noteholders and investors without a layer of corporate tax accumulating in the vehicle itself.
For founders, fund managers and family offices financing assets at scale, understanding how these vehicles work and where their limits now sit is essential before assuming one will deliver the outcome you have in mind.
What a Section 110 company actually is
A Section 110 company is an ordinary Irish company that has notified the Irish Revenue that it qualifies under the regime. There is no special licence and no separate entity type. It is typically a private company limited by shares, often held by a share trustee under a charitable or orphan structure so that it is not consolidated onto any sponsor's balance sheet.
To qualify, the company must be Irish tax resident, must hold or manage qualifying assets, and must have acquired or held qualifying assets of at least a minimum value (historically EUR 10 million) at the time it first carried on the relevant activities. It must also notify Revenue within a set window after commencing.
Qualifying assets are widely defined and include financial assets such as loans, leases, receivables, bonds, shares, derivatives, and interests in such assets. The breadth of that definition is precisely why the regime supports such a wide range of transactions, from residential mortgage securitisations to aircraft leasing to trade-receivables financing.
How the tax neutrality works
The commercial appeal of Section 110 rests on the deductibility of funding costs. A qualifying company is taxed under the rules applying to trading companies, at the higher 25 percent rate that applies to non-trading income, but it is permitted to deduct its costs of funding, including interest on the notes it issues to investors.
Crucially, the regime has historically allowed a deduction for profit-participating interest: interest on debt where the return tracks the profits or results of the underlying assets. Where structured correctly, the vehicle's deductible funding cost can absorb substantially all of its taxable profit, leaving a small, pre-agreed taxable margin in Ireland and passing the economic return out to noteholders.
That is the mechanism in plain terms. The vehicle holds the assets, issues notes, the noteholders receive the economic return as interest, and the interest is deductible against the income those assets generate. The neutrality is a function of matching income with a deductible financing expense, not of any exemption.
It is worth being precise about what this does and does not achieve. Tax is not eliminated from the system. It is shifted to where the noteholders are taxed, subject to their own residence rules and any applicable withholding. Whether the overall structure is efficient depends entirely on who the investors are and where they sit.
The anti-avoidance limits you must respect
The Section 110 regime has been tightened materially over the past decade, and treating it as the loose vehicle it was sometimes perceived to be in the early 2010s is a serious mistake.
The most significant change targeted Irish property. Following concerns that Section 110 vehicles were being used to strip taxable profits out of Irish real-estate loan portfolios, Irish law introduced rules that restrict the deductibility of profit-participating interest where the vehicle holds a "specified mortgage" connected to Irish land. In broad terms, profits referable to Irish property business can be ring-fenced and taxed, removing the neutrality for that slice of activity. If your assets touch Irish real estate, specialist advice is non-negotiable.
Beyond that, the vehicle must respect transfer-pricing principles, anti-hybrid rules derived from the EU Anti-Tax-Avoidance Directives, and interest-limitation rules. The anti-hybrid rules in particular can deny a deduction where the corresponding receipt is not taxed appropriately in the investor's jurisdiction. A structure that ignores how the return is treated in the hands of the noteholder can lose the very deduction it was built around.
There is also the broader international backdrop. The OECD's BEPS programme, substance expectations, and the rise of principal-purpose tests in tax treaties all mean that a Section 110 company cannot be a purely artificial shell if it expects to access treaty benefits or withstand scrutiny.
Substance, administration and treaty access
A Section 110 company is normally administered in Ireland by a professional corporate services provider, with Irish directors, an Irish registered office, and Irish-resident management. This is not decoration. Irish tax residence depends on management and control, and treaty access increasingly depends on demonstrable substance and a genuine commercial rationale.
The company will require audited financial statements, must file Irish corporation tax returns, and must comply with Irish company law filing obligations at the Companies Registration Office. It will also fall within the scope of the Common Reporting Standard and, where relevant, FATCA, meaning it must classify itself correctly and report as required.
Ireland's extensive treaty network is one of the regime's quiet advantages, supporting reduced or eliminated withholding on cross-border interest in many cases. But that access depends on the vehicle being a genuine beneficial owner with real substance, not a conduit inserted purely to capture a treaty rate.
Who Section 110 suits, and who should look elsewhere
Section 110 is well suited to genuine financing and securitisation activity: pools of loans or receivables, structured note programmes, CLOs, aviation and equipment finance, and debt-trading platforms run by asset managers. It works best where there is a real population of financial assets, institutional investors, and a clear commercial purpose beyond tax.
It is poorly suited to holding operating businesses, to thinly disguised attempts to strip profit out of Irish property, or to single-asset structures that cannot meet the qualifying threshold or the substance expectations. For straightforward group holding purposes, an ordinary Irish holding company or a different jurisdiction may be more appropriate.
The honest summary is that Section 110 is a precise tool for a precise job. Used for the structured finance it was designed for, it remains one of the most reliable vehicles in Europe. Used as a general-purpose tax shelter, it now disappoints, and increasingly invites challenge.
How HPT helps
We advise founders, asset managers and family offices on whether a Section 110 vehicle is the right answer, and on the full lifecycle of establishing and running one: qualifying analysis, orphan and share-trustee structuring, Irish directors and substance, banking and administration, and ongoing tax and CRS compliance. Where Section 110 is not the right fit, we will say so and propose the structure that is.
If you are weighing an Irish structured finance vehicle, speak to us before you commit to the design.
The director's note.
Once a quarter. Practical commentary from active mandates — banking, structures, mobility, regulation. No marketing send.
Related articles
Offshore Company Formation & Banking 2026: Why Banking Comes Before Incorporation
The conventional approach of incorporating offshore and then seeking banking has become obsolete. In 2026, identifying viable banking solutions before forming a company is essential to avoid costly delays and structural failures.
Cayman vs BVI: Which Offshore Jurisdiction to Choose
The British Virgin Islands and Cayman Islands both serve as premier offshore financial centres with zero corporate tax and strong legal frameworks. Choosing the wrong one does not break a structure — but it adds unnecessary cost and signals weak professional guidance to sophisticated counterparties.
Best Countries for an Offshore Company in 2026
A considered 2026 comparison of leading offshore company jurisdictions, matched to real use-cases, with the substance and banking realities laid bare.
Want this applied to your matter?
Five days from intake to a written diagnosis on how this topic affects your specific position.