Skip to content
HPT Group
An abstract render of linked blocks

For Crypto, Web3 and Digital-Asset Operators

Licensing, banking and reporting, planned together.

VASP licensing, custody architecture, treasury structuring and DAC8 / CARF readiness. For operators who need to be live.

Market data on a trading screen

Our view

Every digital asset business now falls within a regulatory regime.

Between MiCA, DAC8, CARF, the US state MTL patchwork and the maturing of VARA, FINMA, MAS and CIMA, every crypto operator now sits inside someone's regulatory perimeter. The question is which perimeter, and how to structure for it. We work with crypto-native operators, hybrid fintechs and traditional finance entrants on the licensing, banking, custody and reporting architecture that lets a digital-asset business operate at institutional standard.

What we solve for crypto operators

Four questions we work through with operators.

  1. 01

    Which licence regime fits the business?

    VARA in Dubai. MFSA crypto in Malta under MiCA. FINMA in Switzerland. CIMA VASP in Cayman. SFC VATP in Hong Kong. MAS in Singapore. We model the regulator-fit before any application is filed.

  2. 02

    Where does the structure bank?

    The licence is only useful if the entity can move money. We assess the structure against the requirements of the banks and PSPs we work with that accept crypto businesses before the application is submitted.

  3. 03

    What does the custody architecture look like?

    Hot, warm and cold custody. Single-sig vs MPC vs multi-party. Self-custody vs qualified-custodian model. We design the architecture and the operating runbook, not just the legal wrapper.

  4. 04

    Are we ready for DAC8, CARF and MiCA reporting?

    Mapped against the actual data points each regime requires, not the slide-deck summary. We build the reporting layer alongside the structure.

Questions

Common questions

Will MiCA passporting work for our business?
If you are EU-targeting, yes: under a CASP authorisation in an EU member state (Malta, Lithuania, Ireland, Cyprus are common). If you are global with no EU retail, MiCA is not always the right fit. We model both paths.
Can you handle the Travel Rule technology?
Yes. We integrate one of three Travel Rule providers depending on jurisdiction and counterparty network. The implementation is included in the licence-to-live timeline.
Do you take on already-licensed entities for ongoing compliance?
Yes. Roughly a third of our crypto retainers are post-licence: coordinating MLRO and board appointments through licensed providers, regulator engagement, transaction-monitoring oversight, and ongoing compliance design.

Who we work with

Other clients we advise

We do not give legal or tax advice in jurisdictions where we are not qualified to do so; where needed, we coordinate local counsel and tax advisers.

Fees agreed in writing before work begins. Where a bank or provider pays us for an introduction, we tell you before the introduction is made.

See also what we will not do and prohibited and restricted matters.

Victoria Harbour and the IFC tower, Hong Kong

Next step

Tell us about your matter.

A short application tells us what you need. We aim to reply within 48 hours. The first step is a diagnosis of where you stand today.